The Daily Ping

Computers from 1999

nospam@example.com (Paul) — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

This morning I was rifling through old documents on my computer - located in the "Old Crap" folder - when I found a mockup for an ad. An old mockup.

Back in the late 90s I worked at a local computer store, Maha Computers. Under new ownership it became The Byte Shop without prior knowledge of the legendary California computer store (opps.) We held our own against a nearby Best Buy and Circuit City, but it was damned hard to compete on price to be honest with you.

One of my ideas back then was to have a subbrand of computers. Under Maha they were called "mcpc" (get it? Maha Computers? MC?) but under The Byte Shop they were just kinda "our PC line." While we excelled in custom-built machines we also wanted to offer pre-selected configurations just to make things easy.

Looking back at the specs now is, as you can imagine, a laugh riot. Ready? Here we go.

Orion: $879
AMD K6-2 333MHz CPU with 3D-Now!
Nobilis NB5AX Motherboard
64MB PC100 SDRAM
Western Digital 4.3GB Hard Drive
Actima 40X CD-ROM Drive
Sony 3.5” Floppy Drive
AOpen 56k PCI Fax/Modem
AOpen FX-3D+ 3D Sound Card
ATI Rage IIC 4MB AGP Video Card
Sun 690 Amplified Speakers
Premier 718 ATX Mid-Tower Case
104-Key Windows 98 Keyboard
IBM PS/2 Two-Button Mouse
Microsoft Windows 98
NobleView 14” SVGA Monitor
Two Year Limited Warranty

Man. 14" monitor. 333MHz. A whopping 4.3GB hard drive and... what's this? A floppy drive! All for 900 bucks.

Now, most of the PCs' specs were just modifications here or there. Some had awesome video cards (4MB of VRAM) and some had increased memory (128MB.) But the top of the line unit was the Atlas for $2509. With that you got:

Intel Pentium III 500MHz CPU w MMX
Asus P2B Motherboard
128MB PC100 SDRAM
Western Digital 10.2GB Hard Drive
Creative Encore 5X DVD-ROM Kit
Sony 3.5” Floppy Drive
AOpen 56k PCI Fax/Modem
Creative SB Live! Value Sound Card
Matrox Millennium 8MB AGP Video
Sound Image Lite Speakers
Premier 718 ATX Mid-Tower Case
104-Key Windows 98 Keyboard
IBM PS/2 Two-Button Mouse
Microsoft Windows 98
NobleView 17” SVGA Monitor
Two Year Limited Warranty

I'm a little scared to think about what that'll buy you today. Upgrades available on all machines included a Zip drive (awww,) a DVD-ROM drive, or NT 4.0. Astounding!

Anyway, it was a fun trip down memory lane but I'm really pleased that computer technology has gotten way better.

Lazy Ping Day

nospam@example.com (Ryan) — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

You know, I'm late with today's Ping and I have absolutely nothing to write about. So, shall we go with a video of Bob Barker being creepy, courtesy of fourfour?:

Save the Dolphins, but Don't Show a Sign During the Oscars

nospam@example.com (Paul) — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

By far one of the weirdest moments of the Oscars, for me, was when the winners for Best Documentary (The Cove) took the time to display a sign telling people to text DOLPHIN to 44144. It was bizarre because, clearly, one of the producers had rolled up this sign and stored it somewhere in his tuxedo.

ABC cut away nearly instantly the moment the sign was shown. Lots of boring audience shots ensued.

Incidentally The Cove looks really interesting. And if you were wondering where you'd seen Fisher Stevens before it was either Early Edition or, more likely, the Super Mario Brothers Movie.

Hotel Bidets... with Zach Galifianakis

nospam@example.com (Ryan) — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

I dedicate this SNL sketch to Paul:

Incidentally, wasn't this weekend's SNL the best one in recent memory?

Buying Eyeglasses Online: Go for It

nospam@example.com (Paul) — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

Friends, I'm nearsighted. (I blame it fully on years of squinting at computer monitors.) Thus I've had to wear glasses and contact lenses for quite some time. I switched to contacts back in high school and while I still have glasses, they're mostly for nights and whenever my eyes are tired.

The pair of glasses I had were outdated, old, and pretty crappy to be honest with you. I got them for a song at America's Best, one of the few eyeglass chains not owned by Luxottica. (Seriously - they own so so much.) But again, I needed new ones to match my slightly updated prescription.

My wife had had a positive experience ordering online although her first pair didn't quite pan out. She still got a nice pair of frames for super cheap after I had told her about Glassy Eyes and Matt Haughey's experience. I decided to go for it too.

After I had my annual eye exam I asked my doctor for a written eyeglass prescription as well as my pupil distance, or PD. As Matt says once you have those two items you're ready... mostly. It's also good to measure your existing pair of lenses very very carefully, as I discovered. Once I did that I shopped around and found a nice pair at EyeBuyDirect. I placed my order using my FSA and within a week and a half, I had new glasses.

Unfortunately they were way too big for my face. I thus got to experience EyeBuyDirect's customer service which was fine, but not stellar. I was able to return the glasses with no problem but I was out the shipping costs round-trip. It ended up costing $10.

While I had planned to exchange my eyeglasses at EyeBuyDirect I found another pair I liked more at 39DollarGlasses. Sure enough my pair was, uh, $31... because I had a coupon. Ordering was easy here too and in under a week I had glasses.

The end result is very good! The glasses fit well and I really like the way they look. They came with a good quality hardshell case, cleaning cloth, and mini repair kit. I only have two small quibbles. First, the frames are painted plastic and I can see very small imperfections around the lens. Not enough to notice from even a reasonable distance luckily. And second, the right lens doesn't fit as snugly as the left lens. Much like the paint it's such a slight thing that it's not even noticeable; I could easily take it to a optometrist to get it tweaked but since these are limited-use glasses, I likely won't. If these were $50 or $100 glasses I'd be peeved but, really, I can let it go at this price.

All in all I'm quite happy with my purchase. I remember back in the olden days that I couldn't imagine buying, say, shoes online but now I do... so why not eyeglasses?

Undercover Boss

nospam@example.com (Ryan) — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

Here is the formula for every episode of Undercover Boss:

1. Boss announces to his board that he's going undercover in the entry-level jobs of his (always his) company. Board looks SHOCKED.

2. Boss works undercover and finds one job he simply cannot do, one job with an employee supporting a family of 13 on minimum wage, one job with an employee with an inspiring attitude despite some physical hardship, and one job with a manager that needs an ass-whipping.

3. Boss "learns a lot" and tells his board that "a lot of things have to change."

4. Things change, at least for the people featured on the show.

5. Boss and company end up looking very good.

Roger Ebert Tries Micropayments

nospam@example.com (Paul) — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

Roger Ebert, a national treasure who recently got his voice back thanks to technology is rolling out The Ebert Club. For $4.95 per year you get a number of members-only benefits for his site and, of course, get to pay the guy for the work he's done. Here's the signup page.

Ebert also wrote up a blog entry on the whole idea of micropayments.

I remember with what glee Gene Siskel and I once pondered [Nicolas] Negroponte's book [Being Digital], with its speculation on whether users would pay two cents to read two of our reviews. Negroponte actually used us as an example. Gene and I pounded on the office calculator: 250 reviews, times two cents, times 10,000 users, or 50,000 users, or three million users...wow! If three million people paid two cents for our reviews, there'd be $15 million for us to split! But, hey, even if 5,000 users paid two cents for half our reviews, we'd gross $12,500. Nice.

I think anyone who has run a hobby website has had similar calculations run through their heads. It becomes, "If I want to make a little money on this, how much would people pay? A dime? A quarter?"

Ebert's price point is a good one, I think. His timing couldn't be better what with his impressive media exposure and widely-recognized writing quality. It's a good experiment and to be honest with you, I hope it works.

Britney Spears, News Anchor

nospam@example.com (Ryan) — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

A dream I had the other night:

I was in New York, walking around as I am wont to do. I walk past a news reporter talking into a camera and notice that it's Britney Spears. Apparently, she's now a CNN correspondent. She's soliciting passersby for their comment on a random question. Given my good luck in situatons like these, I stepped up.

Her question, "Why do you think it's so windy out?"

My response, "I blame President Bush."

Pizza Pieces

nospam@example.com (Paul) — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

When enjoying a non-deep dish pizza, I enjoy seeing my pizza cut up into squares instead of triangles. Squares are a nice size: easily portable and still super tasty.

But there's one dilemma: those darn center pieces. You know the ones - the ones without any crust at all. It seems that whenever we have a pizza, we get stuck with a bunch of the middle pieces. They're good and all but, really, the edge crust is important. (I wonder if the inventor of the no-middle-squares brownie pan could get a pizza sheet going?)

What's your favorite piece? And if it's the middle, be prepared to defend it.

3D

nospam@example.com (Ryan) — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0500

So, I finally saw Avatar today. And, yes, yes, I saw it in 3D. And, yes, it was pretty cool and 3D is improving, no doubt. But I have just three thoughts to share about 3D in movies:

1. Not every damn movie that comes out needs to be in 3D. The fact there are enough 3D movies coming out to take up the entire set of previews shows there are already too many 3D movies. Most of them the third part in a series (gee, thanks, Friday the 13th, Part III!).

2. Most movies in 3D may look good, but will suffer in other ways. Even in Avatar with a director as talented as James Cameron, there were some really awful performances and sections of the script seemed to exist solely to show off 3D crap.

3. The best parts of Avatar weren't the scenes where sharp knives or bullets are coming right at the viewers, but the parts where the 3D is so subtle, it's barely noticeable. This is where it really enhances the moviegoing experience. The whole stuff-coming-at-you thing is neat the first time, but the 50th time, it's like, "Yeah. We get it."

The HydroRight Dual Flush Toilet Converter

nospam@example.com (Paul) — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500

Friends, I've gotta tell you that I've been less than impressed with one aspect of my homeowning experience thus far: plumbing. While our house isn't terribly old (only about 40) the plumbing has had sporadic issues since we moved in, some major and some minor. One minor problem that always bugged me was our toilet - namely, the flapper.

Our flapper started leaking last year. As a bonus the handle broke a bit so I decided to kill two birds with one stone and replace them both. Since then it's been nothing but trouble. While the flapper did fit the valve fine, it just didn't work as well as that old flapper. I adjusted the chain countless times, had to reset it often, and just thought the whole system was flawed. I mean, am I really still just pulling a chain to flush a toilet in 2010? Really?

Nevertheless, this week I finally had it and set out to get a new flapper. But then I started wondering if there were alternatives. My trusty sidekick Amazon told me that there were. While I had initially settled on a more sophisticated flapper system I then discovered the MJSI HydroRight Dual Flush Converter. It was about five bucks more than the other flapper system I was looking at - twenty bucks.

This really intrigued me. First, it did away with the stupid flapper. Good! Second, no handle. Great! And third, a dual flush mode so that small, ahem, loads would use significantly less water than full ones. Perfect! I read the Amazon reviews - noting that the bad ones were really bad but were still in the minority (ie, the GOP) - and decided to go for it.

I did the install yesterday. They aren't kidding when they say it takes 10 minutes, but for me it was 15 due to operator error. Didn't need any tools, either. I popped that sucker in and only had to adjust the light flush amount a bit in order to get it going. But that was that - super simple. And now I'm just that much closer to realizing my dream of having a perfect toilet.

So far so good... and anything that uses less water is a plus in my book. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to take my weekly 12-hour shower.

Steam Cleaner Haiku

nospam@example.com (Ryan) — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500

Steam cleaner, cleaner
of carpets, of gross pet stains,
Oversized, but loved.

Browser Check

nospam@example.com (Paul) — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500

A quick Ping for a Friday afternoon: which browser are you using?

I've got Safari 4.0.4 for the time being. Just had a nice stint with Google Chrome, but it's not quite my favorite.

Millennials Quiz

nospam@example.com (Ryan) — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500

This morning I took the Pew Research Center's Millennials Quiz, which basically tells you if you're an old fart or not. I scored a 28/100, which places me at the tail end of the Baby Boomers, about ten years before I was actually born. Apparently, I'm an old soul. Or something.

What's kind of neat about the quiz (BTW, it's short, only 14 questions and takes just a minute or two) is that after you take it, you can modify any answer and see how it changes your score. What surprised me was that when I changed my answer for "In the past 24 hours, did you watch more than an hour of television programming, or not?" from Yes to No, my score went up, meaning that millennials are watching less television than adults (presumably spending that time looking at different sorts of screens). Also surprising was that when I changed my answer to "How important is a having a powerful, high-paying career?" to "Not at all," my score dropped and when changing it to "Very" it increased my score. I would not have expected a high-paying career to be more important to the younger generation. I've gotten the impression that while gadgets, etc. are still important to them, that being happy was overall more important than being rich. I guess not.

Let us know what you score and how closely it matches your actual age.

Lazy Revolvers

nospam@example.com (Paul) — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0500

Every day I have the pleasure of using revolving doors. While they can often lead to hilarious results more often than not it's just a way to get from one side of a place to another.

However.

Yesterday I was entering a revolving door on one side and a woman entered the other side. She made it in first. And instead of moving forward and pushing the door, she appeared to just grab the handle and wait for me to do the revolving. This, of course, gave me little incentive to move forward with force so I too gave it a weak push. In the end I was in the revolving door for over an hour and missed 8 meetings.

I exaggerate a little.

It's entirely possible that this person physically could not push the door, I give you that. But my first inclination was to label her as a lazy revolver - a freeloader who just wants to have someone else do something for her. Worse, nothing she did indicated otherwise.

Let's hope this isn't a trend.